Other Coworkers: Animals in the Workplace

History would suggest that a coworking relationship between humans and nonhumans is rarely equal and is typically characterized by subjugation, sadness, and a controlled population expansion of “useful” species. GBHB demonstrates that another more equitable, more beneficial, more respectful cross-species coworking environment is possible.

The following article appears in Harvard Design Magazine “No Sweat” No. 46 F/W 2018. The Magazine in its entirety and other excellent works can be found a this link

Other Coworkers: Animals in the Workplace

Throughout human history, nonhuman animal life and architecture have been deeply entangled, often localized around work. Early agriculture compelled a need for human and nonhuman animals to cooperate and cohabitate. Permanent shelters were created that organized early farming life and framed a human–nonhuman divide. Stories of agriculture and husbandry were spun, which became foundational elements of human mythologies and shaped what it meant to be human.

Until relatively recently, well into the industrial revolution, beasts of burden—horses, cows, oxen, donkeys, and even some dogs—were valued as major contributors to heavy labor on the farm, city streets, construction sites, and the factory floor, often outnumbering their human masters. Today, in much of the world, the nonhuman animal is no longer considered essential to labortheir numbers and presence in our cities have reduced greatly. Animals are not conscripted to perform the menial and dangerous tasks as they once were and we do not commingle or commute with the urban pig, horse, or cow as we once did.

A growing body of work is seeking to reintroduce an “animal” presence into our overtly human worlds—and, in some cases, into the workplace itself. These co-species explorations believe that a rich diversity of urban life is possible and will ultimately foster a more resilient and just ecosystem.

For example, the Garden Building for Humans and Butterflies (GBHB) made by Husos in 2007, in Cali, Colombia, is a work space for a women-run design atelier called Taller Croquis. It is also a house for butterflies. Here, the atelier’s craftswomen are immersed in natural light, fresh air, living foliage, and more than the occasional butterfly.

Most importantly, the GBHB is a reciprocal environment. The craftswomen benefit from the rich design, while the butterflies receive an oasis in a dense urban core. Here, the building’s designers have taken the of butterflies to heart, creating small pockets of soil and vegetation in the interior facade for the insects, festooning the exterior with vegetation, and relying exclusively on natural ventilation.

Historically, our nonhuman coworkers were subject to a devil’s bargain. We needed them for production, and as a general practice we abused our power over their lives. During that time their populations ballooned, while in the years since then, they have dramatically dwindled to almost entirely disappear from our daily lives. History would suggest that a coworking relationship between humans and nonhumans is rarely equal and is typically characterized by subjugation, sadness, and a controlled population expansion of “useful” species. GBHB demonstrates that another more equitable, more beneficial, more respectful cross-species coworking environment is possible.

 

 

You May Also Like

Commentary on Archinect

"..to me, this is not Animal Architecture. I feel they have taken a term that was already being used to describe other projects..." Visit Archinect to read the rest of the thread. Post a comment!
Read More

UrbAnimals

What was lost along with the disappearance of animal life in urban centers? Clearly there were problems with the 18th and 19th century modes of urban animal life but surely there were benefits. How can we learn from past periods of beastly cohabitation? I think it would makes us all the more human.

Insect Art

More insect art comes to us this time through DeZeen Magazine. The images below show the work of…
Read More

A Monstrous Architecture part 2

"A Monstrous Architecture," is a serialized collaboration between Ryan Ludwig (previous contributor to Animal Architecture and Assistant Professor of Architecture at Syracuse University) and Ned Dodington. In 2011-2012 Ryan and Ned had collaborated on a series of posts title Architecture in the Darwinian Arena.

Philip Beesley’s Hilozoic Soil

...the glass-like fragility of this artificial forest, built of an intricate lattice of small transparent acrylic tiles, is visually breathtaking. Its frond extremities arch uncannily towards those who venture into its midst, reaching out to stroke and be stroked like the feather or fur or hair of some mysterious animal.... [Fundacion Telefonica Jury, 1st prize, VIDA 11.0]